Infinity means: Never stop counting. m and a derivative of m. d(m)

I just read an article that we have been able to measure the smallest unit of time ever so far.  Like a Zeptosecond they call it. It's a trillionth of a billionth of a second. That's a decimal point followed by 20 zeroes and a 1, https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/54631056

Keep that in mind, the smallest measurable unit of time.  Time will end, the last star will die, gravity gone, all ten dimensions aren't, there "isn't".   So, we have a first quantum and a last one of time.  If we have the smallest measurable unit of time, that would be the largest natural number.  Whatever large, or small number we can derive from this natural number is the first and last number, we have to stop counting.  d(m), a derivative of m is the smallest and largest number then, right? That would mean numbers don't start at 0 or any other guess, it would be the first number.  Correct?  I have no idea.  space/time, not two discrete objects. Whatever number gets you there counting any provable way, that stops there.  The number m, d(m) is the end, and the beginning.  I think right?

Hawking: If something isn't measurable, it doesn't exist.  So, everything is measurable, or it simply isn't.  Hawking tries to explain to people that the question "What happened before the first second?" Is not a question.

Time begins, at the every first zeptosecond.  There is no "before", as there is no dimension of time until that moment.

What about after?  The last zeptosecond happens, weather big freeze, big rip or big bounce, the last zeptosecond happens.  So, right now, the smallest measurable unit of time, from the first one to the last one, that is all that is countable.  That is the largest natural number.   The counting stops at some point.  Nothing exists outside the universe, so there is no after (even if it bounces).  It would not be possible to count and never stop counting.  

That is what infinity is, never stop counting. Would that mean there is no infinity?  What about the space between 0 and one?  If there is no infinity how could there be an infinite number of places between zero and one.  OH!  There isn't, it stops at the largest or smallest if inverted number too.  Yeah, it works.

So, maybe, I think that would makes time the context for size.  Which is dynamic, as the smallest measurable unit of time gets smaller.  So, the largest number is up to us.  The universe is counting on us? Time varies in rate, place to place.  Time does not expire equally at the same rate everywhere.  Not even on earth.  Oh boy, we're fucked!  But not infinitely.  Is this close or am I just high af as fuck right now?


High again, it's like 2/18/21...if there is a smallest measurement of time, then there is a smallest measurement of space.  What is it?  What is the smallest amount of space we can measure?  Whatever that is, if Hawking is correct and if something isn't measurable it doesn't exist, then what happens when we find a smaller measurement of space?  What are the natural limits of time and space?  as ideas not numbers, how does removing the idea of infinity, when counting in math, maybe more, change the context of how we are mathematically here, now? 

Looking back, to now, where would we be, without the need for certainty?  How would calculus be?  If one over "m" was the slope of a curved line?  If it's all finite, then it's finite.  I don't know if it is or not.  So, both ways have to be accounted for, infinite and non-infinite?  The maths change? Is this right?