The Case For Special Circumstances Murder
If
it's special circumstance murder to murder a cop, then it is, for the equal
inverse reason, be special circumstances murder, to be murdered by a cop.
Color of Authority. Look a society cannot be killing the government, that
is a total failure in governance. Yes, it should be special
circumstances to kill a cop. It's special because of who the victim
is. For that same inverted reason, who the participant is, in this case 4
cops, using the very color of authority we gave them as the murder weapon
itself. This is special circumstances first degree murder. Let the
appeals courts sort it out after they all four are locked up for life.
(Can you have pockets sewn on to their jumpsuits please)
It feels like first degree murder, because the government, our government,
treated this man like a locker room bench. Why was he even face down in
the street? How can they explain that? Pure and simple they knew
they could. He was compliant, and cuffed and doing what he was told, why
was not placed in an air conditioned police vehicle? They dehumanized him
for sport, turning him into furniture they could kneel on, maybe that's some
anti-Kaepernick thing, kneeling on black men after placing them on the street
for no reason? Why was he on the ground?
The
audacity of these four men, to ignore the breath in our lungs, who do they
think they are. They knew they were commanding him, they knew they forced
him for no reason onto the gutter, they knew they were kneeling on him, like he
were a bench, and they knew that did not feel good and all that violence killed
the man. We are not ruled, but self governed. The one holding
Floyd's legs, maybe if he could say, uncross his ankles, there would have been
another centimeter for his lungs to grab some air and he'd still be
alive. They all four of them assertively, casually, callously, with hands in pockets, bored almost, like a slow day at Auschwitz, under
color of authority, killed one of us. When we kill each other it s a
crime and involves those humans. When they kill us it's a constitutional
issue, and each killing affects all 330 million of us.
I mean what would let the government know when they do it, it's especially egregious, like if they raped him before they murdered him? Our government does not seem to get the idea of "equal". If it's special circs for us,it's special circs for them. Equal.
That's why this feels like first degree murder, because it is, murder under color of authority. Is there a way for you to demand these logical, reasonable things on tv? Would that do anything? Even if it’s just support? Make people think?
The Case For
Intentional Murder
The
first reason is simple. I am 55 years old. You know this because I
just told you. After I told you, you know this. That's what words do. Convey information. In this case, the
victim told the murderers that they were killing him. Moreover,
witnesses, also told the murderers in English, they were killing him.
After they told the cops this, the cops knew it. Cognitively, in their brains they knew this information, that they were killing him. Yet, we allow them to claim their brains did not know. Their brains did know, that's what words do, we just covered that.
Once their brains acquired the information, their brains did something criminal and racist or elitist or authoritarian, something not normal. Their brains pretended it did not matter, they could barely hear, wit hands in pockets, this claim, in context no less, were processed by their brains differently. That is on them. Do black people really need to convince white people they are responsible for hearing words they just heard. even when they are seen and heard hearing those words on video? "I'm sorry your honor, my brain is racist. not me" is not a defense. I think there is a law in CA that allows black people to grow the hair out of their heads, how it naturally grows out of their heads.
They should be
deemed to have known as a matter of law. These cops speak English, and
were told they were killing him. Whatever defect in their brains
that did not make the connection between black and human and dead is their
problem. They knew, they were told, in English, many times. Is
their defense that they were too stupid to fully understand those words.
They have the words "stop resisting" down so well, they issue these
commands fraudulently, unconstitutionally and criminally. So those words
they get but not "You're killing him"? We should ask the
court, to rule, in this case, as a matter of law, they knew they were killing
him, because they were told many times. If the court does that, cops all
over will heed those words in the future and others like "My arm! you're
hurting my arm" and other words too. It is in the public interest to
not hold these four cops to a standard of mentally challenged person, but as
gown men who speak English, the consequences of their racism is on them.
They must be as a matter of law, determined to have understood they were
killing him. That might make it first degree, at least intentional
murder, and also prevents some other such injuries in the future.
The Case For Special Circumstances Murder
If
it's special circumstance murder to murder a cop, then it must, for the equal
inverse reason, be special circumstances murder to be murdered by a cop.
Color of Authority. Look a society cannot be killing the government, that
is a total failure in governance. Yes, it should be special
circumstances to kill a cop. It's special because of who the victim
is. For that same inverted reason, who the participant is, in this case 4
cops, using the very color of authority we gave them as the murder weapon
itself. This is special circumstances first degree murder. Let the
appeals courts sort it out after they all four are locked up for life.
(Can you have pockets sewn on to their jumpsuits please)
It feels like first degree murder, because the government, our government,
treated this man like a locker room bench. Why was he even face down in
the street? How can they explain that? Pure and simple they knew
they could. He was compliant, and cuffed and doing what he was told, why
was not placed in an air conditioned police vehicle? They dehumanized him
for sport, turning him into furniture they could kneel on, maybe that's some
anti-Kaepernick thing, kneeling on black men after placing them on the street
for no reason? Why was he on the ground?
The audacity of these four men, to ignore the breath in our lungs, who do they think they are. They knew they were commanding him, they knew they forced him for no reason onto the gutter, they knew they were kneeling on him, like he were a bench, and they knew that did not feel good and all that violence killed the man. We are not ruled, but self governed. The one holding Floyd's legs, maybe if he could say, uncross his ankles, there would have been another centimeter for his lungs to grab some air and he'd still be alive. They all four of them assertively, casually, callously, under color of authority, killed one of us. When we kill each other it s a crime and involves those humans. When they kill us it's a constitutional issue, and each killing affects all 330 million of us.
That's why
this feels like first degree murder, because it is, murder under color of
authority. Is there a way for you to demand these logical, reasonable
things on tv? Would that do anything? Even if it’s just support?
Make people think?
Stop Resisting
Ok this old man in Buffalo gets knocked down, the cops lie, get caught, those few got suspended without pay and the 56 others in the unit, quit the unit, not the cops, protesting the unfair treatment of the cops?!?
Now rewind to their job interviews, all of them. You show them the videos of this old man and ask them their thoughts. To a person they agree it was a good way to police in America, and would not only support it, but protest by quitting something to support it. Would we hire any of them?
No, of course not. When the problem is the system itself, it so difficult to point out. But here it is, these people, who we now know, for a fact, ought never had been hired, will not lose their jobs. Even though they are the problem, the system itself, we hired the wrong people, you can not train that out. Racism is racism or copism being elite as a cop. So rest assured, those people will be cops and if they think they can, they will do that to your grandfather, they told us so. Just if there's no camera's.
Their excuse "I was following
orders", they bashed an old mans head in and their defense "I was just
following orders", welp that is an argument that did not work for the
Nazis at Nuremberg and it sure as hell better not work in any court in
the United States. Disgusting. How would an American attorney not know
what a bad thing to say that is? Now they gotta fight Nazi accusations.
Just disgusting and stupid. It was always the system itself. #FireTheBuffalo56
Defund The Police
We should be guarded. All week people keep saying we ought to de-fund the police in this country. It sounded ridiculous to me. Get rid of police? I can't imagine how foriegn and stupid that must sound to more than half of us. Not just the usual closed minded half, but even to open minded people. It turns out only 5% of arrests are for violent crime. We do not need police with guns for the rest.
We are the most precious resource of our country. In fact the resources are the country. If you have an allegiance to us people and this land you are a patriot, that is a good thing. If you have an allegiance to the apparatus, you are a nationalist, that's un-American and a bad thing. Americans are not more equal than others, and there's no separate but equal, they tried that already.
So, as the most precious resource, we should have a system of guards to guard us. City Guards, County Guards, Federal Guards...and a small police force for the times when we need tough guys or gals. Which is hardly ever.
Why wouldn't the government want us protected? Why do they feel the need to "police" us, when for the most part, we are law abiding? A guard would protect and serve, that would be the job description, to protect us. Today that is a marketing slogan, police have no legal obligation to protect and serve. A police protects words written down in criminal codes, guards would protect us, the humans. I think that might be better.
