15$ Sorry, in capitalism, the system does not allow for a living wage

15$ Sorry, in capitalism, the economic system designed by geniuses to make a nation go, does not allow for a living wage. The designers of this economic system, designed a couple of thousand years ago, did not understand people need to eat.

Neither side wanted this.

So democrats and republicans agree, capitalism on the wealthiest land per person, in the history of land or people, can't work. The geniuses were wrong, and this lot nailed it. The only way is to have the poorest of us not earn enough to live.

There simply is not enough on this land. So, the 535 of them guys want us to believe we have too much wood the can't house us all, we have too much food they cant nourish us all. That's stupid. I know how to count.

Thee systems would work in Moldova, they certainly would work here. It's not us we can't afford, it's the 535 of them, and their 80,000 buddies, they fit on one football stadium. The count is off.

Either Plato is a moron, or we are getting robbed. We got loads of stuff. Someone is lying to us.  No one knows how to count?  Where is all our stuff at?  

Who of the 535 of you has more wealth the day Trump leaves office than when he came.  They did it!  

We're out half million dead, tens of millions made ill and over ten trillion governed from us to the 80,000 super wealthy.  What?  Ooops?  We accidentally governed ourselves more stuff?  You intended to use our stuff for our health and safety, but you accidently ended up with it in your accounts, by mistake?  

So, there's probable cause our stuff was stolen, res ipsa loquitor, where is it?  So, I'd like to know, who got more now?

Today 2/16/21 we see the virus changing, this is a date to remember. We saw this coming.

 Today 2/16/21 we see the virus changing, this is a date to remember.  We saw this coming.  The wrong people were in the capitol building.

If we do not want these systems, why are they on our land?

Subject: one who lives in the territory of, enjoys the protection of, and owes allegiance to a sovereign power or state.

I just heard they want a formal investigation into what happened Jan 6th. The 535 want to know what happened. Now? Dozens of them pretended to not understand how our voting works, they lied about a stolen election. The 1st amendment is regarding a "redress of grievances", to redress is to set right, a grievance is a wrong. To redress a grievance, is to set right, some wrong.

Lying about an election being stolen is not a wrong. It is an intentional act and it turned into a crime, many. By dozens of the 535 of them, still in that building. Deciding what happens to us, our stuff and how bloody it will be when our grandkids are war age. Choices requiring morality, conscience, empathy for today and the future. Dozens of immoral humans, who have already forgotten, the names of the dead on Jan 6th, as if it had nothing to do with them neither, I suppose, are still in charge of us and our stuff. I wonder if they took some of that stuff. Lack of morality and all, liars have been known to steal. (Liars on both sides about all issues.) These were not people down the bar spouting shit about elections being stolen These are the apparatus itself. What might be foreseeable from those particular people going all over media and lying about a stolen election? Maybe, those dead bodies.

I think I heard in the impeachment, the charge read Trump was "solely" responsible for what happened Jan, 6th. I do not agree to that, that is immoral. That was to cover themselves, if I heard that right.

So, we have a list of those responsible

The 535 of them not doing anything to stop it, #1, our legislature Trump

Facebook, Fox and Other media

the No voters who are guilty by conspiracy or deed

Mostly: Us!

We let them do this at us. I just heard they want a formal investigation into what happened Jan 6th. The 535 want to know what happened. Now? After the lost impeachment trial. I think it all will fall on the 535 of them. We let them tell us how they were going to govern us. And also, they governed us. In the way they just told us they were going to.

Making us subjects, not citizens. And look at the results. Subjects, like lower than a vassal. Technically speaking as a matter of political science. We have not been self governed. Look: I don't want this gun system. It's almost as if it was not made for me. But my brother also does not want this gun system? Like it was not made for him either? This gun system seems more like it was designed by the gun industry and published at us, not for us. If no one on this land wants that system, why is it on our land? If no one on this land wants that system, why is it on our land? If no one on this land wants that system, why is it on our land? Do that with all the systems. This is messed up. I don't want this food system, nor this education system, not the criminal justice system or the health system. None of them. If no one on this land wants that system, why is it on our land? If no one on this land wants that system, why is it on our land? Let that sink in, the 535 of them are in charge of the words, and the checks. So, wouldn't that mean, they did this? Is there anyone else in charge of the words? Yeah, sure big question, like a conspiracy, except, what conspiracy? This is what the words mean. We are subjects. Not citizens. Weird to type. But, these are technical terms with technical definitions. This is what the words mean: Subject: one who lives in the territory of, enjoys the protection of, and owes allegiance to a sovereign power or state. That is Nationalism. See, it all comes together, an allegiance to the state, not the country, but the apparatus. Bad. We find ourselves here now. We are subjects to systems published at us by the 535 of them for industry. Subjects. It's supposed to piss you off. But, we let them do this at us. I want my systems. Don't you? I sometimes wonder why we all aren't like "If these 535 can't figure out to get the different groups, what we want, lets hire 535 who will. And find out what they have done with all our stuff? Where is it?". I would prefer to live under systems that make me free, why doesn't everyone. Always asking the 535 for a compromise. Well I don't to want to compromise. I want my brother to live free as they see fit, and those people how they see fit and my group how we see fit. Self governed. I mean if you want a pool full of bullets go for it, legally. With 535 of them also letting us live where no people get shot most days. We can do both. Why wont we demand both? I never get that part.

So, this is where we are, Nationalism. An allegiance to the apparatus, the state, not the country. The country is us people and this land, if you have an allegiance to us people and this land, you are a Patriot. If you have an allegiance to Nancy or Chuck or Mitch or Trump, or the military or any part of the apparatus, you are a Nationalist. That is bad an un American.

Us people, this land. That is the United States of America. The 535 of them are not. They are in charge of what happens to us people and this and and the stuff in it. No one else. Just the 535 of them. Nothing happens to our stuff that is not traced back to them. That is our system.

They were supposed to represent us, write laws, make an economy and use use our stuff at us for our health and safety. That's it. Oooops, they missed. Something a computer would do if you owned a hot dog stand.

Americans are not more equal than others, all the people are created equal. America is #1, as is Botswana and Denmark. I don't want to be a Nationalist, the Naca Party has to go (Nazi was National Socialist, I say Naca is National Capitalist, the Naca Party). We are the wealthiest, so where is it all? Can we find out who has more wealth now? Of the the 535 of them, who is doing better while we die and have food lines. They did not accidentally publish words to make themselves accidentally millions more accidental dollars. That's stupid. France can see us, this is embarrassing sometimes, as obvious as it all seems. Can we find out what they are doing? Where all the stuff is? Why other countries with less have more? Why is the count so short? These are numbers, why cant we know what is happening at our stuff? Maybe because we are subjects, their subjects. Subject to the words the 535 of them publish at us for industry. #NotMySystems. Replace the 535 of them, fix the hole (our rights come before their one person individual rights, they can have them once we are protected from them), we tell them how to govern, then they govern, does that fix it? Does following the instructions fix our main issues, the 535 of them? That is my question. Is it time to count and re-boot, all 535? Maybe that would get our stuff pointed at us.

How many Senators voted know under threat of violence or death? Isn't Nationalist violence at the government, why they were in the room?

How many Senators voted know under threat of violence or death? Isn't Nationalist violence at the government, why they were in the room?  So, if more than 10 voted 'No' under duress, Nationalist violence won, right?  

(Um, Naca Party, National Capitalism, the Naca party.  Not Nazi, that's National Socialist.  Here they are Naca's)

  
Why not find out which republican senators voted under duress? Who's own constituents threatened them with violence or death if they convicted? Don't they call that tampering? Is that not a mistrial? For this very reason? So, this literally doesn't happen? The thing that is happening at us right now?

If you think about it, that is why they were in the room in the first place. Nationalism, that violence. What was the rush? That could have been enough republican votes there? Protect those who are in danger, in public, out in the open, find the Nationalists, threats via Phone records, emails etc. They call those investigations.  Tampering laws protect us.  What would the truth have done?

Look, if enough senators voted 'No' under Nationalist duress, the Nationalists won. Period. It worked, their violence worked and they won. What was the rush? That would be sad, a group of Nationalist beat our Senate. Great system. If the reports of threats are true. Seems kind of important to me. Threats or no threats, that is the question.

What if they are in on it together? Democrat and republican?

See the question marks in the title? That makes this a question, not an assertion. No conspiracy theories allowed here. Everything, all the ideas have to be measurable. Everyone keeps blaming the republicans for the verdict. What if, the democrat's are involved as well? What if the democrats, as a group, wanted this outcome also? What if they always want this outcome? We always get it, no denying that. So, if the results fit, that would make sense right? Not that it's true, just maybe it's time to ask. Are we getting this played? Would that explain our current situation, better than pretending they are trying to help us but can't? Who benefits? Are we getting played again, who of the 535 of them got more now?
Just as a homework assignment, if they are stealing our stuff and not helping us, what would fix it, without messing up anything else? (Another ignored email to another media person, Fareed Zakaria) You asked what the fix is. I'd like to ask; what would happen if equally, everyone in the country, before any human can assert any individual right, the system counts the number of constituents who are dependent, and the group rights come before the individual rights?

That fixes everything right? As a matter of political science and systems design. A sheriff might have 10,000 or 4,000,000 rights on their back. Each congressperson has two groups, all of us and their district. I have zero groups. Is there anything unfair about that? Picture a congressperson as a peacock, with 330,000,0001 feathers on their back. Now picture the 330 million of us, each with only one feather on our backs. We can do nothing at the group with our one stupid feather. We can't sell our stuff, hide behind the feathers, get caught and still not get in trouble. If you had all them feathers, you could use "pour judgement" too. The money come pouring in. That would our stuff, if they are stealing. We need to take that advantage away from them, they rule us and we are subject to the systems, industry designs and they publish at us. Making us subjects, not citizens, living under these systems, no one in the country (aside from the 535 of them) wants. So, if the 535 of them has been stealing our stuff, I mean the count is short, literally. Then this would fix it. Who of the 535 has more the day trump leaves office compared to when he came. They voted that money there, into their own accounts then. No one else is in charge of our stuff. They govern themselves more, as we die and go broke and have food lines? They voted themselves more or our stuff. We needed that stuff this time, health and safety wise, the count was short, did they continue to rob us as we die? 100,000 dead not a mountain moved 200,000 dead not a mountain moved 300,000 dead not a mountain moved 400,000 dead not a mountain moved Their building got messed up, hair messed up, all scared, no none of the 535 dead, ALL THE MOUNTAINS MOVED. They used our stuff at themselves again, because they got scard. Wanna see scared? Youtube people in hospital finding out covid is not a hoax and they are going to die. Actually die, from the thing they are scared if. Correct me if I'm wrong, the 646 got scared, but no one got hurt or died. MOUNTAONS MOVED, there is no moral explanation for this. Pointing the broken windows policy at the window before it broke, and not at the shards of glass on 110th street, that would would work. Our rights come first, not an individual, that lacks structural soundness form the system level. If you have no constituents, this is not a big issue, but those who do, this is the issue. Our rights come first, 535 people or 330,000,000 people? Who should the system protect? This is unsound. One fix, simple, our rights come first, fixes the banks, the wars, all of it. Right? As a system issues in political science that is the bug, correct? We could design how they get elected, govern and retire. For the good of all of us, right? If there is nothing to steal, no way to steal it, then we have more stuff, right? It's counting! Every little white lie they tell, they tell for one reason. If they didn't lie, you would know explicitly, they do not represent you, so they lie and pretend they do. Now we have too many who don't represent us. I would like to point out, the super wealthy class, last time I looked was 300,000 Americans with 50 mil and up. Noe, 80,000 with 30 mil and up. This virus of group is eating itself, like the Greeks and Marx and Engle wrote. No one is saying anythi9ng as this happens in front of our eye, the proletariat of the word uniting on American capitol buildings as the super-wealthy dwindle in impossible ways. 460,000 dead, saving the stuff of a subset of 80,000 people. That is immoral. The 535 of them have a job description: The allocation of resources to govern for the public health safety and morals. 80,000 super wealthy--------- 470,000 us dead from covid--------------------------------------------------------- OOOOOOOPS! They missed. Who got more now, they did it, right? Of the 535, who governed themselves more wealth as we have food lines? res ipsa loquitor. They can not govern half million dead, tens of millions made ill and during trump, a transfer of wealth over ten trillion plus dollars, and they got some of it? What? Rounding error? Mistake? "My bad bruh", no crimes? They intended to use our stuff for our health and safety? It mistakenly ended up in their accounts? Maybe, we are getting robbed form the capitol building. So, our rights come first. That fixes it, right? And we got alt right marching with "Right to Work" signs, in America! The alt right are Marxist, calling capitalists, socialists, it's bizarre! How does, "our rights come first" not fix the banks, the wars, the money, the resource distribution, all of it? This is my question, as a matter of math and system design and political science how does this not fix the whole thing? This does not touch the system just how it is deployed. This does not touch the first, or second or any Amendment. Just no more cheating. who is against that? The 535 of them. My question is if our rights came first, we could tell them how to govern us, then they govern, right? Self-governed. As it is now, they do both and we are subjects not citizens? Is that right? Would that fix anything?

Redress of grievances, I googled the words, with reading and stuff

 "Redress of grievances"
I googled the words, because I can read and count and stuff:

Redress: remedy or set right (an undesirable or unfair situation). [verb]
Grievance: a real or imagined wrong or other cause for complaint or protest, especially unfair treatment.

Well, does promulgating a fake election scam qualify in any sense?  Let's count:

If there was no stolen election, and no reason to think there was, there was nothing to set right.  So, no redressing was happening in this case.  Next.

A false wrong is not real or imagined, it is proven false.  A version of true, in that: not true.
So, in this case there was neither redressing, nor a grievance.  

We dont need no rules

 "And because the usual rules and procedures of an American trial do not apply to the Senate's impeachment proceedings, it stands to reason that there will be dramatic differences in how senators approach their responsibilities. But by any sensible measure, it's tough to defend tactics like these."

Why, lets not do that. I mean what are the rules for, that they throw away? These 535 have superpowers, the rules don't apply to them? These superpowers, the 535 are able to put bias and their own wants aside and do what's best for the America? Why isnt this the story? No they can not.

What is the history of the rules you speak of? Were they made for show? Or perhaps they serve things like equity, fairness, truth, justice, honor, what, these 535 just throw all that out and we have to live with it?

Why do they get to cheat us? In the last "trial", these same ones cheated and as a direct result, someone who cant read or count was in charge of our virus and half million of us are dead.

The 535 see no connection. None. The consequences of them cheating last year are all this dead, ill and money gone. And they are about to cheat again. How many of us die this time? Will you go broke? Your kid catch a nasty covid variant and be dead in an hour, as they cheat? Who of them has more wealth now, they did it.

Let it sink in, the 535 of them see no connection from half million dead Americans and all the damage their cheating is still costing us. Let that sink in. They consider their last vote a "WIN"! Let that sink in. They are about to repeat it. Let that sink in. They govern at us like they hate us. Like we are an inconvenience to suffer on the way to the bank, off our 450,000 so far dead bodies.

So, I call out the press, you were written into the constitution to be a conduit, in between us and the apparatus. So you could stop this, them cheating. We let you sell the information, now you are part of the apparatus and we are surrounded. You simply accept them cheating?

Why is it ok to throw out the rules put? The rules what make this proceeding fair, for America. Forget these 535 people in my capitol, what about us? Maybe 535 of should hear this case? We are still broke hungry sick tired and dying for the last time they cheated us like this. So, what is the press gonna do about it? Get paid I suppose. Screw us. We are surrounded. No one is coming to help us.