The Confedracy is roaring back - National Capitlism aka the Naca party

When in the course of human events when one peolpe become politically different, the one group forces the other group to live as they don't want to?  I don't think so.

In Florida they are fighting to keep a Confederate States of America name, on a school again.  Now, the Confederate States of America had it's own borders, it's own Constitution and Laws.  It's own Executive, Judicial and Legislative branches of government.  I think they even had an Administrative branch too.

It had it's own own laws, defense and military.  It's own soldiers and generals.  They even had their own banks and currency and contracts and debt with other nations.  You have to be a nation to do that. They were another country.  Not our country.

So, regarding the Maga crowd, If our Civil War were still going on, and wars have lasted way longer than that, and someone were repping the confederate flag on our land,  what team are they on?

If the Confederacy is their honest choice, without the slavery obviously, why are we fighting?  Seems accepting different approaches, in teams, might be a place to start.  We could declare we won this war already.  You lost, we won you have to do it our way!  That is not allowed though.

Speaking of which, if these republicans are confederates, can someone make a list of all the qualities of "Confederate" to see if they match.  So we don't need to guess.  If they are confederates, then they got to go.  We won this war already, they can not come in through the back door.

The the Confederate's side, start everything from the singular, "me". The other side start from the plural, "we". Both on one processor. Imagine your laptop running almost windows and almost Mac at the same time. This spreadsheet opens up looking like windows one time, then mac the next.  This browser or word doc mac this time, windows next. Each app, each window different a little each time.  Where is the x button? That is how we have deployed America. One system open, the other closed.

ps: In Florida the argument was that black Africans sold black slaves and that's where we got slaves, from other black people.  We did not get slaves from Africa.  We took farmers, and teachers, and warriors, and cooks and moms and sons and forced them, violently, into slavery.  These confederates are different.  It's truly disgusting sometimes.

How to make Somalia: Special Report: Arizona Governor Deucy, decided he would gess when to lift covid restrictions.

Seems to me, if we split up by region. The "me" people over there, and the "we" people over here, we could get something done. Like, I think we would live exactly as everyone wants. Not just covid, but all of it right? Guns, healthcare, abortion, education  All of it.

Like if you want to be part of the group when it's time to enjoy and use the newest phone or plane, but not be part of a group when it's time to mask up or contribute in some way, go on one side and make a place like that.

 

Us others, go over there. Next virus comes, you do it your way, we'll do it our way. After a few viruses, as your numbers dwindle, eventually, we'll have all the land to ourselves. That's what we should do.

Man oh man, would I vote for splitting up and living exactly how we want in 2 seconds. Imagine filling your pool with bullets and swimming in them if you want. And us? Most days nobody got shot? That would be awesome! No god in our lives unless we wanted. You guys can have only illegal abortions, no legal ones. Each system as we wanted, not forced upon, making us subject to them, like now. We are truly "subjects". Instead, if we imagine for a second, that we split, what would it look like?

Every system you live under matches what you say you want! We get what we want, plus bonus, watching how you, and handled the same issue we did on the news each night. It'll be art...comedy, tragedy, missteps after lie after death. Like some discovery channel docuseries instead of "How to make a chopper", it's "How to make Somalia". Step one, guns and militia, check. Two, might makes right, aka the biggest and the strongest is more equal: check! on and on.

Everything would be as we wanted.

This post, about individual mask choice, is literally incorrect. From someone who studied the math, before you ask. Individuals do not get the virus, an individual cab get a sinus infection, not a virus. No one is patient zero today. Groups get virus, each of us is just a cell. This is not a medical issue, doctors play just a role, a role usually we don;t need, if we do the math. A virus is a math problem. The virologist and the epidemiologist, have language, that when mixed with the mathematics for group behavior, are how to solve a virus. It is literally just a math problem.

In English, the group is a discrete object. The group is one thing, you are billions of cells but just one thing. "me'" vs "we", the constant struggle, hint the answer is usually "we" obviously.

Using the math for discrete objects, called discrete mathematics, we can know what will happen at the group regards to this virus if we follow the science to x% and so on.

We can not, I repeat, in the universe, there is no mathematics for the individual in the group. This lady is literally wrong. She can not tell us what will happen at us regards to this virus as she goes off on her mask individualism . Period. It simply is not possible.

From someone who studied the mathematics, she is simply guessing from the singular or "ME"! Here's why.

When the math comes out: new phone, app, car, medicine, both groups, the singular or "me" group, and the plural or "we" group, take. As they should. But there is another pattern.

Every time the math comes out that we each need to contribute calories to the group, the "ME" group goes all "ME" and don't want to. Instead they grow magic math skills and rights. Nope they are just takers. Take take take. I do not know about you, but I am tired of paying for their mistakes and blindness.

Make them go over there and make their own stupid country. "Me the people", "We hold this truth to be self evident", the singular suits them just fine. They are just selfish, and are unable to resist their instincts. that's all this is. Let the confederacy rise again with no slavery (if they can resist their urges), and go over there and leave us alone.

The best definition of "Intelligence" I ever read is: The ability to rise against instinct. Look at all our dead. Nothing has ever killed so many, in all human history, than the inability to rise against instinct. Shame on them, Shame on us.

Guns and stuff - A Conversation about our systems and who's they are.

Were were meant to be self governed.   Instead, the government does both, It tells how they are going to govern us and also they govern us.  We were meant to tell them how to govern us, then they govern us.  Let's see how it works out in real life.

60% of us want tougher gun laws. 40% do not.  My brother, we'll call him Austin, he would like to buy himself 1,000 rounds a machine gun and a bump-stock and a tank today, and he can't?  In his own self-self governed land?  I know how to read, he ought to be able to do that. I want him to be able to do that.  Seems, maybe he ain't self-governed.  If he were self governed, his self would be in that capitol building, governing his-self, the right to do just that. He can't!  He definitely ain't self-governed. 

The gun system underneath which he lives, was not published for him.  He is not free under it, he is subject to it, making him a subject.  Technically, as a matter of political science.  That is not freedom.  Self-governed is freedom.

So the 40% don't want this gun system, what about the 60%?  Well we know how to read also, like the word "Amend" meaning to change.  More important we know how to count, and if we counted, and changed in 2021, we could live under a gun system were most days, nobody got shot.  Other countries do that, we could do it.  If we lived with people who wanted to count. 
 

The gun system underneath we live, was also not published for us.  Neither team is free under this gun system, they are subject to it, making them subjects.  Technically, as a matter of political science.  That is not freedom.

Any way you look at it, the 40% dont want this gun system, and the 60% dont want this gun system, we agree on this gun system.  We do not want the gun system they placed on our land.  Wait, what?  Is that right? YUP!  Why am I the only one pissed!  This is our land.  There are 535 of them and 330,000,000 of us, who do they think they are?

So, why can't we all live under the gun system we want?  Where did this gun system come from?  First lets look at where it was supposed to come from.  That's easy: us, the people, self-governed.  We were meant to have 535 representatives who represent us, write laws to make a system to match us.  Ooooooops they missed, on every single system.  We don't want this education system, abortion system, food system bank system, health system war system, oil system on and on and on.  We got used to the water temperature, it's time to get uncomfortable, this ain't right.

This land is full up with systems no one on this land wants, except the 535 of them.  That should piss you the fuck off.  535 people are somehow making us live in ways we really do not want to.  How?  Why? Is it that hard, can they not tell what we want?

What if, the gun system was not created by our legislators.  What if the gun system was designed by the gun industry itself.  That would make industry our actual legislature.  And the government more like a publishing house.  Paid by the writers and us!

Now the question becomes, did the gun industry design our gun system for them or for us.  If it's for us then we are citizens.  But, if it's "at" us, we are subjects, being ruled.  Yeah yeah I get it, those words are ridiculous, unfortunately in political science "Subject" describes people being ruled not in the ruling class.  So, if that is where we are, well, a thing is what it is, it isn't something else.

So, look at the entire government differently for minute, see if this makes sense.  It looks more like a publishing house than a government.  It looks like they get paid by industry to publish the systems underneath which we live, "at" us.  So industry creates each system, conveys it to the 535 editors, in hotel conference rooms (seriously). 

Then the publisher signs.  Then the 535 take a bunch of money from us, use a small amount of that money to send the words to some of the 15 print shops (the cabinet), and they publish these systems at us, getting paid by the writers and us.

That makes us subjects, and means they are governing at us, for industry.  Hmmm.  So, industry is self-governed, we are subjects.  We should make a gofundmepage and pay the 535 of them to stop publishing systems at us.  We are not self-governed.

(***We have election day, we go to the polls.  Either we are going to the polls as individuals or we are going to the polls in groups.  Groups, they just spent a few billion dollars making out of  data and cognitive science.  Individuals vote, groups cast ballots.  The same technology they use in business to sell pots and pans.  Exactly the same.  No magic, no mystery, just counting, like with ALL explanations.  The mathematics involved are called discrete mathematics.  Someone might want to count this at MIT or somewhere.  This answers "how" we could get robbed this bad.  If that is what is happening.)

So, it seems to me, we agree on all these systems, like the gun system.  We don't want them.  The part I don't get is how we are not all filled with incredulity, who the fuck do the 535 of them think they are?  They can force 330,000,000 of us into every system that industry wants?  Our rulers, that's who. They think they are our rulers, those smirks.  I don't know, looks more sensible this way.  I yell a lot less.  I think you yell because whatever stupid thing they just did on tv, pisses you off.  But, it is not stupid if you look at it this way; they are robbing us, from the capitol building, for industry.

I am alone with my fury at these 535 people who have stolen it all from us, including our systems.  Look around, would making one system for some people and another system for the other people be rocket science? No, Europe does it.  Asia does it. 

I mean how does everyone not get steaming mad, looking at how we have to live as they make us?   If you want to fill your pool up with bullets and swim in them, that's exactly what those words read.  I am pissed for you.   If you want to live with minimal gun violence you ought to be able to.  It's your land!

So, if anyone ever reads this, look at the ones you like in the capitol building, it's them, they did it.   The ones you like, stop voting for them.  And the fix just fell apart.  We would never agree to fix this.  Never gonna happen.  So, the rest is hypothetical. 

See, you dont do that, look up, see ahead, sacrifice something today, for tomorrow.  I would, I would agree with all my American brothers and sisters, to voluntarily not vote for anyone who has ever sat in one of those 535 seats, ever again ever.  Even the ones I like.   What could be more fair to all of us. From AOC to Mitch. Nancy to Lindsey, Porter and all, gone.  There are 535 of them, and 330,000,000 of us, fuck them. we can sort out the criminals from the others later.  Maybe it's not fair to a couple of dozen of them, tough shit, there are 330,000,000 of us!!!

But that's not enough, the hole, the bug is still there.  This government hates us.  No one who likes you would treat you this way.  The count is short, they took our stuff, we've seen that already looking at derivatives.  The stuff was not enough, they took half the money.  That was not enough, they took every single fucking system we have, and absconded with the systems too.  We don't want them.

All we got, is some social freedoms, to distract us, literally.  They don't care about that.  You can travel, study, whatever, be religious or not, Yankees or Red Sawx, they don't care.  The rest belongs to the 535 occupants of our seats and their 80,000 super-wealth buddies.  80,000, they fit on one stupid football stadium, we just died a half million to save the stuff of a few of these people.  Because of the words the 535 of them published at us. Words that were supposed to use the stuff in the ground, at us, for us, to save us.  We got robbed.


So, it seems there is a government on this land, but it is not ours, it is not governing for us but rather, at us.  The systems it publishes are a burden to us and we are subject to them.  Making us subjects. Subject is when there is a ruling class and you aint in it. As an American, does that sound familiar?  Let me re-type that, as a black man in Mississippi in 1820:

As a black man, I live on a land where there is a government on this land, but it is not mine, it is not governing for me, but rather at me.  The systems it publishes are a burden to him and he is subject to them.  Making him a subject. 

So, what am I missing?  Can anyone look up and count.  Maybe we ought to fix this bug, fill in this hole.  Counting works, let's count.


If you're still reading, count the rights.  I suggest one fix, fixes everything.  Let's count.  Rights, lets count them.

I am one person, just some guy walking down the street.  I want to imagine we all have a quiver, for feathers.  I have one feather in my quiver.  One stupid powerless feather.  Just like you and the 330,000,000 of us, one stupid feather each.  We each have one person's rights in our quiver.


If you are a sheriff, maybe you have 10,000 feathers and then your one feather.  A congressperson has their district's feathers, plus another 330,000,000 feathers for the entire group, plus one for them.  On and on.

There is nothing you or I could do at the group with our one stupid feather.  We can't sell our stuff, get paid, get away with it.  How would sell a fake war or the Glass-Steagal Act?  Even get caught, we do not have all those feathers to hide behind.  We do not get to ask our buddy in another part of the apparatus to help.  Usually they just go on tv and let each other go, and 12 of us don't need to see shit.  "No reasonable prosecutor would bring these charges". Cheaters.

Picture the one you hate most, Nancy, Mitch, AOC, Lindsey, Nunes, Jordan whoever.  We all feel the same when we our nemesis smiles at the camera with those smirks.  Knowing they got away with it.  It's this.  The rights were not counted correctly.  A few of the founding fathers seemed somewhat smart, for their day.  But for the most part they were not.  There were men who, for the most part (Hamilton, Franklin a few others aside) could not count backwards, or understand even what a negative numbers is.  You know more about the universe than most of them could understand.  They designed our systems, that you live under today.  They finished in 1787, p-hacked to death and it took them 9 years to design this mess, that is ridiculous.  And nothing is working.  They could not count these rights. 

We know how to count now.  No one would design this land's system like this today.  Moreover, these systems are deployed horribly.  If you can't put a democratic republic practicing capitalism on this land, you literally can't put one anywhere.  So, either Plato is a moron, or we are getting robbed.  I am not suggesting a change to the system.  Leave the amendments alone.  Just a re-deploy, so there is nothing to steal.  That is easy, once we count the rights, and make the rights more equal.

So, they have too many rights, and they assert their individual rights ahead of the group they represent.  Which, by the way are supposed to be part of.   That is not math, it's cheating.   They are supposed to represent the typical human in the group.  Look at Nancy and Mitch, typical of who? Industry, they do represent those they govern for.

So, in math, I do not know how to type it in stupid lawyer words, the fix:  Before anyone is allowed to assert one right, their feather bag needs to be checked.  Take their feather out, if it's empty assert any right you have.  If it it is not empty, nope, no right to remain silent, no right to an attorney, no rights at all.  As foriegn as it sounds.  Not until the group's rights are protected.  Go be a fucking florist if you dont like it. 

There are 535 of them and 330,000,000 of us, fuck them and fuck their rights, our rights should come first.  So each crime, would  have probable cause penalty, and probable cause of a crime would come with prescribed jail time for probable cause.  Stay away from the fucking lines.  Remember, you have all your rights, you get all your rights at all times.  Until you acquire other peolpe rights.  No longer will that be currency you can enrich yourself with, but rather a burden to filter out the cheaters and takers.

Nancy would be in jail for domestic violence and other crimes, Devon Nunes for treason with phone records, Rudy too, 'mens rea' Mitch too, Trump too.  Eric Swawell would be locked up, Hillary, Bill, Both Bushes, Biden, Cuomo, Kavanaugh, Comey Barret, Graham, Jordan, John Kerry, Obama, Pres Johnson, Nixon, this is ridiculous. The AG in the Breonne Taylor case, and the George Floyd case, the entire apparatus of Flint MI, Jim Comey, Barr, Pompeo...this list would take a long long time.  The dozens who lied about the election, that's five foreseeable dead bodies.  This is stupid.  It's time to put down the stupid lawyer words, and count.

If our rights come first, that fixes everything, the banks, the wars, the stealing, the lying, the voting, the money, the health, the air, the water, the guns all of it.  Mostly, those fucking smirks, that make your blood red, gone!  No more being ruled.  We tell them how to govern.  The smart people can begin to fix things.  Why, because then, we would be self governed.

Johnson could not lie us early into war on August 9 1964.  The feet he wanted on the ground so bad, on them first battle fields, that are still calcifying?  They, would be home now.  The Clinton's could not sell the Glass-Steagall Act, or have left the White House 16 million in debt, making 400K a year!  what was he gonna pay it back with? Monica? Good question actually, whatever he offered in consideration for $16,000,000.00 in notes, was not his, he did not own it.  Someone should look.  Cheater.  Nor cold they have sold hundreds and hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of dollars of BOOKS AND WORDS AND STUFF.  (That always makes me furious, we are the stupidest people ever!!  No Americans have ever been this duped). 

Next, Cheney could not start this fake war.  He spent two years selling us this war, items on the menu:

1) Thousand of emails and dox regarding Yellow cake: LIE
2) 60,000 aluminum tubes, LIE
3) Photographs of Mohammad Attah: LIE
4) Photographs of places: LIE (in the UN at earth in our name!)
5) 2 witnesses: LIE
6) WMD: LIE
7) 9/11: LIE

Are we at war for zero reasons?  No one is disgusted by this?   A self governed peolpe would not let this happen.  America does not need to cheat to win at anything.  Not science or business or policy or war or anything.  We dont cheat, they are the cheaters.  Not one reporter, in two decades, has covered why we at war for zero reasons?  Well for Cheney it's money and power.  For Bush?  Maybe it was father's day, instead of a tie rack, let's attack Iraq!  These are the games they play with our stuff and our lives, because we are not self-governed. 


How did we start 2020, Imminent threats, almost nuclear war.


Repeat after me: There are 330,00,000 of us and 535 of them.  Fuck them and fuck their stupid individual rights.


We tell them how to govern.  Making the system such that it is free from corruption is simple, you make it so there is nothing to steal.  No getting wealthy after office, period.  It's more to it than that, but that is a basic start to the fix.  Go be a fucking florist.  There are 535 of them and 330,00,000 of us, fuck them and fuck their rights.

Imagine we were self-governed, and we are uncomfortable with how the 535 are doing us.  what could we do?

No more 6 year terms.  Only 2 year or 4 year terms and every 4 years ALL 535 and the white house is up for grabs.  We never get to look at each other and decide do resolve them all.  These cheaters.  They knew that.  If we made the system, we would not be at their mercy and tricks and cheats.

Also, we set salaries and raises.  Insurance and Pensions, both match ours.  We could vote them a bump when they leave office, if they did well for us.  Motivating them to raise our standard of living at all times, up up up, for us us us.   But, that's all they are allowed.  Their pension and bump.  Any other monies goes in the pot.  They can sell a book for 100 million dollars, they can keep their pension amount each year, the rest goes in the pot for healthcare and schools etc.  No getting rich after office.  Now, there is nothing to sell.  There are 535 of them and 330,000,000 of us.  Fuck them and fuck their rights.  This is stupid.  You don't like that, go be a florist.

What else,  psych exams, sociological exams, make sure the understand numbers and can count.   also, a 12th grade reading comprehension test in order to run?  You can't be a law writer if you can't read.  Remember that one guy, like 238 years old, been in the capitol building since, well, I think he was an usher at the Ford theater as a kid, during the 'Our American Cousin' run.  That guy knew he was going to be on tv, knew he was gonna be talking to Zuckerburg. But, he did not know what email is, or what a browser is or how facebook makes a penny. 

So Mark told him how he makes a penny, and the old man was befuddled.  Unable to comprehend the spoken words, and still doesn't know, how facebook makes a penny.  That guy could have voted us into this fake war for all we know?  How long has this moron been making choices about our stuff, campaigning and lying his ass off that he can write laws.   This cheater, will be involved in how bloody it will be when our great grand kids are war age.  If he can't understand the spoken word he can't pass a 12th grade reading exam.  He is charge of our stuff!?

There were dozens in the capitol building who did not understand that once the polls close the numbers are discrete.  You count one pile, the mail in votes, and you get a number: x.  Then you count the other pile, just count 0,1,2,3 etc, it end where it ends, and that's that number. After the voting stops the numbers are separate. 

Ok that is not as simple an idea as "the car is red' or "this is a cat".  But these are not dudes down the bar, this is our apparatus.  They cant pass a 12th grade reading test.  Or maybe they lied and they can.  If so, they lied from being a congressperson or senator.  About a stolen election?  Those five dead bodies are perfectly foreseeable from a congressperson or senator, let alone a group of them, lying about a stolen election.  That is negligent homicide, asking not "did they know dead bodies were foreseeable" but rather "should they have known" and hell yeah.

So, we can't make all 535 of them take a 12th grade reading test.  Why?  They got individual rights.  There are 535 of them there 330,000,000 of us, fuck them and fuck their stupid rights.  We would have the right to now if there were morons or murderers in our capitol building.  We have probable cause to think so now, and no right to find out!  Why do we put up with that?

If the rights were counted properly.  Our system would work, if we re-deploy it without this bug.  But unfortunately they have individual rights, the 535 of them, those rights come first.  So, we probably are ruled by morons and murderers, we'll never know.  France can see us, we look like idiots. 


What else could we do?  How about scholastic data?  How do they and their kids keep getting into genius schools and yet they seem dumb.  So, their scholastic data, do you think they have better grades than us?  If so we should do some gene editing so we can all get into Yale.  If would look at that data going back say 50 years, I bet we'd know a lot about the people in those 535 seats.


What else?  Financial data.  Imagine forensic accountants and investigators searching earth for their monies and analyzing it and reporting on it.  Do you think their money moves over time as ours does?  That would be self-governed.  Maybe when we lose 10 trillion some if it ends up in their accounts.  Ooopps.  If the vp at the bank accidentally has $10,000 deposited into their account, that is stealing. If it ends up in my account it is an accident.

The 535 of them can not accidentally publish words at us, that take trillions of dollars from us, and transfers it to the 80,000 super-wealthy.  Oh  by the way, some of the 535 got some?  By accident.  If it ended up in my account, that is an accident.  This is stealing.  You can not accidentally govern yourself our stuff!  (It's a polynomial coefficient someone smart can count the actual odds, probably trillions of years before such an accident could happen, just ask Boston to count for their country.  There are literally zero reasons to guess.  This is simply a math question, "how likely is it that, the 535 could accidentally govern themselves millions of our dollars?"  MIT, probability depart, simply ask.  Do not guess, please, again, there no need to guess.  Remind them if they don't count for us, no one else can.)

Only 535 people are in charge of the words and the stuff.   This ain't no who dunnit, if the count is short, they did it.

The government's job description, in political science class, is: The allocation of resources, to govern for the public health safety and morals.  Oooooops missed again.  They took the resources, we didn't get the health and safety, the count is short!  Where is all our stuff at?  These are numbers, this ain't peotry class, where the fuck is all our stuff?  Let's fix the rights being counted and go look at the 535 of them, go back a few decades and let's know.  What they have done with our stuff.  This is the wealthiest land ever.  Where is all our stuff.  There 535 of them, and 330,000,000 of us, fuck them and fuck their stupid rights.  Why doesn't everyone want to know for sure who did what at us?   The human brain is fascinating.

Index of Suspicion - The Master Key - The Primer

Index of Suspicion, at one point it referred to the idea, that of it does not occur to you to think of something, it is not possible to think that thought.  So, before you think anything, it has to occur to you.


That makes sense.  Reminds of Pascal and Fermat staring at a cube of coin flips when suddenly, naturally, it occurs to Fermat' brain to ask "Can we use the maths to know what will happen next?" Like how?  How did that occur to his brain, just chance, like genes making "random" edits? 

So there is a sphere of all the ideas.  Only a sliver of them are available to us, and the to the groups we belong to.  The more wide or open the angle, the more ideas become available.  Not that we get to think them necessarily, but at least it's possible. 

We can not think any of the other thoughts ever. Until it occurs to us.  For Fermat, staring at a puzzle of coin flips, made that idea occur to him.

Using the data and cognitive science we can mimic this process, at groups.  Not the individuals in the groups.  Discrete mathematics, used at discrete objects is old settled math.  The data science and the cognitive science is newer-ish.  They are using the combination and it seems a form an artificial selection process, literally changing the species. 

The Key:  Seems they are selecting what ideas, would or would not likely enter the index of suspicion of the group.

If they are doing this with the elections, that would explain how every 2 years, 100 plus million people could visit 435 plus x pairs of people, and almost 435 plus x times in a row, select the one what's got more money than the other, in a who's a better candidate contest.  I know how to count.   I'll never understand why no one at MIT gives a shit that, we are not voting?  If I can rant, I am a moron, and I see this clearly, they must know.  A binomial coefficient is not possible, this is ridiculous.  If good Will Hunting would stand up and count for their country maybe we can count our way out.  The voting and the stupid lawyer words as deployed at us, don't work.  That's what got us here.



So, if you were born in Cabrini Greene, and the idea that a person in your group can get out of Cabrini Greene never occurs to you, you ain't getting out.  Well, unless you're the chess or math or basketball champ.  It has to occur to you.  Since we can manage this at the group level, what occurs to the group, should we not set the cognitive scientists to do their magic with colors and vibrations and sound etc to see how to do that for racial issues?  For adults to lower the temp.


But kids, what age does it occur to us people are different race. What if we set ou tto skip that lesson, then we would not even know.  So, for kids one approach for adults another.  who knows.  This stuff works.  Think back to those two mass shootings in a row.  No idea if some one did, but we have the ability to point stuff at millions of people looking for one to do a mass shooting.  We can make that happen now.  If you have the media resources.  at the groups.  Looks different now huh?  It is time to count.

It's index of suspicion.  That could be an answer, at the group.  Selecting racism out of the species, the large amygdala, hate, greed, lying, hurting out of the species. Instead Mark Z is selling pots and pans, I bet his mom is so proud.

we have the technology to fix this now, just waiting on the hardware.  The fix looks easy now.  why is no one talking about it?

Why do we believe things that are not true?

It feels good.  Dopamine.  Humans walked across planet earth for 300,000 years, because we didn't know how to count.  Then somehow, like 4,000 years ago, the Sumerians learned how to count, immediately get the wheel, and now we don't gotta walk no more if we don't wanna.  If we don't count, we do not get, anything.

The answer is simpler, we are not taught "how" to know things. We are not taught what it means to know. For example, you know that every even number is divisible by 2. But do you though? Like "how" do you know? The answer is counting, and not like what your thinking, there are two ways to count and each has sub-maths under them. That is how we know things, we math at an idea or we we science at one. That's it, math or science. That measures repeatability.  (Every number is divisible by 2, is proven by disproving the opposite. It's not rocket science google it if you want)

Hawking wrote "If something is not measurable, it doesn't exist".  So, to exist is: "I am countable therefore I am".  Aristotle called the set of ideas we can't measure part if the third law of logic, The Exclusionary Middle.  Why do we believe them or not believe them? 

Because we do not know what it means to "Know" a thing.  That proof itself means "repeatability".  If an idea is repeatable, we can count on it in the future.  Maths tell the future, it is not guessing. 

So to knowif an idea is countable we must count.  We need to either science at the idea or math at it.  Period. Every even number is divisible by 2, for everyone, everywhere, at all times.  There is no your truth and their truth.  We would not have planes or phones.  Repeatability. If the idea is repeatable it is knowledge.  Knowledge is dynamic, it changes over time as we become more moral and open to new ways of knowing things.

If the idea is not repeatable, do not use it.  Put it down, and don't make us use it.  Go over there and make your own country and use it at yourself, please.

Ok about 2,500 years ago we stopped “believing” answers and started proving them in earnest, binary.  Galileo gets born, Newton, later Pascal and Fermat, and from that math and science in 2,500 years we got everything we have.  Belief did not really make anything, in 300,000 years, we had like catapults and swords, they had towns but no sewers, people died of typhoid it stunk and was disgusting.  That’s what “believing” things made in 300,000 years.  Turns out proof is required to make whatever system you are trying to make.  It’s an option, but when we opt not to, we tend not get anything useful.

We learned how to prove things by asking one question “Is it?” with two possible answers, yes/no, on/off, -1/0, innocent/guilty.  We went from no proof or belief in 300,000 years, to our first way proving things for the past 2,500 years and now we are entering a new way to know things.  It turns out two possible answers is not the best way to prove a thing.  We are stuck in binary, literally, two: yes or no.  A couple of decades ago I read a book buy a mathematician Lofti Zedah called Fuzzy Logic.  That is a good place to start.   This is not a binary math, it is a multi-valued math.  So binary is going away, and fuzzy math will take over, for technical and moral reasons.  So today you can ask a binary computer “Is this thing a cup?” and you will get a “yes” or “no” answer.

The new way is to ask two questions, not one question, but two.  “How likely is it, that this is a cup?” and “What is the significance, in context, of that answer”, so a thimble might be 0.000003% a cup.  The certainty is gone, as you ask these new machines questions and it gives answers, it learns from each experience. So the next time you ask it that question it will be better at answering it.  Whew I was wondering how I was going to express that, that machines get better.   It “learns” as if cognitively.  It’s three dimensional, so today data is carried on a bit, on or off.  These new machines have cubits, not binary bits, multi valued bits.

All that matters when you’re trying to make a systemic pathogen cure or a new conveyance system is “how likely is it” and “what does that mean”, the answers to those two questions is how we prove things better.

So why am I typing this, these quantum machines will boot up and they will learn.   So imagine someone smart at Yale, made a plan with smart people at MIT and made the first fuzzy judicial system (hmm, FJS fuzzy Judicial Systems).   Here is what I think this thing could do.

The result, it’s February, how many court cases had their final appeal, final bit of process so far this year?  How many started 5 years ago, or 10 or 20?  How many got reversed?   I am pretty sure these new machines would get it right the first time more often with the same contemporaneously available law and facts.  So the little girl gets her $2million for that car accident when she is 5 not 17, when she needs it most.  Less people would get wrongly locked up for 18 years things like that.  

And at trillions of operations per clock tick, these answers would be immediate maybe.  And the more they are asked for answers the better they get at it.  If there was a box that did this and without using it officially, but some smart person, mirrored the current system at some point the machine would outperform what a human judge, jury and attorneys could.  A lawyer with this technology could do very well in court maybe?  But more important, at some point 100 years form now, people would start to ask “why are we doing this the old way?”.  

The Old Way:  Two people arguing and a third person adjudicating?  Cave people did this.  Two younger ones, grunting and gesticulating, about who's sticks is who's.  The elder grunting 'you' at one of them, to shut them up.  I went to college, they were in groups, they had social order.   So, we walk into a court room to prove things, in a system designed before humans knew how to speak, let alone prove things.  Yet no one in the court room is taught, ya know, how to prove things.  Considering all that, they done pretty good.  But it looks kind of stupid looking backwards in time.  Barbaric, guessing at poeplelives and nothing gets better.  It's time to count.

S now we know mathematically, things like, a case by case basis is the opposite of how we prove things.  It is singular, and proof is part of discrete mathematics.  That is all the maths, except non-linear varying quantities.  Sets of things, not the individual.  There is no individual.  Always the conflict between the "me" and the "we" in math and in politics.  That is how we are divided.  Those who's group begins at the singular, like Jefferson.  With, those from the plural, like Hamilton.  Like the deal they made to move the capitol ti Washington.  "me" vs "we".  The two maths do not mix.  we have been unable to make one system for both man groups.  We have one processor and two operating systems, a WOSA or open system and a closed one.  We can't run both.

Every idea has to be measurable, we have to count.  It is time to put down the stupid lawyer words, and count for our country and design these systems.  If it was me, and I wanted my systems sorted out, I'd hire people who, ya know, design systems.  But hey, that's just me.  I like democracy, we can do this your stupid way.  Not bankers and lawyers and business people.  We got robbed.  Big deal, shit happens, let's rid ourselves of this lot, 535 people hold u sup?  Let's replace them, voluntarily, with bug fixed.  Well, it's a nice idea anyway.  What an eye opening movie that would be. 

Imagine forensic accountants looking for, and then looking at, the financial data of the last 4,000 occupants of our capitol building.  Like back to Kennedy maybe? Whatever, a bunch of them going back.  I mean that is data, we would know for a fact it they have been trying to help or have they been governing themselves our stuff.  Exactly how bad and who.  Nope not gonna happen, 535 people, strangling 330,000,000, for a super wealthy class of only 80,000 people.  We got robbed, lol.  This system has a bug. 

The rights are mis-counted.  Groups, again the "we", they dont have one persons rights on their backs, they are groups, we are not.  We have one person's rights on our backs.  Like a bird with only 1 stupid feather.  They each got 330 million feathers, plus their district, plus their 1 feather.  That is a lot of rights.  To hide behind, to sell our stuff.  We cant ever use our one stupid feather at the group.  That imbalance needs fixing, so there is nothing to steal.  Counting, everything is countable.  The group rights need to come before their individual rights, like a kid a joining the navy, sacrifice if they want to dedicate their lives (choke on words) for their country.  Bug fixed.  Our rights, the group of us, not the individuals in the group, are protected first.  If an idea isn't countable, don't use it.  Let's count the 535 of them first.

If someone lawyers you a flight system do not get on the plane, you will die.  If you could dopamine a wheel.  If you could gut or common sense or instinct a wheel, elephants would have wheels.  The counting is optional, but required to not kill the other people.  So stop making us live in political and economic systems they are guessing at, these 535 morons.

So, these quantum boxes, if the boxes do what they promise, seem to be able to fix earth.  'Project  Sum' 

If one tried to do this today the most likely thing would be fear the machines take over.  So from here to there, is a journey, and I think some smart lawyer doing this privately might  be a decent road map.  I can tell you this, whoever gets here first wins.  I mean it could perform tasks regarding business or trading.  It could be come the best resource allocation system ever, replacing the need for government as it is today, entirely for the mathematical benefit of all the resources. 

That should be 'Project Sum' a resource allocation system that could be pointed at any jurisdiction.  Wow, political nirvana, the cheaters gone.  Not getting robbed, not one penny getting robbed.  Imagine that, plus the system itself, all the ability it has to allocate resources we never could.  I was born too soon.  We are not good yet.  The right holds us back more than the left does.

Getting humans to accept that certainty is not needed is not going to be easy.  The idea that we are NOT trying to find out if this guy did this bad thing, but rather how likely it is, is contrary to the human need for certainty;  Yeah, math doesn’t care about any of that.  If we want the correct answer, to actually make a teleportation system or cure disease systemically, we will do it this new way, or it won’t happen.  Look, too many things are counter-intuitive, that is why we have to use proof.  Instinct had 300,000 years, it does not work.

Hundreds of thousands of years of "Belief Time", belief sucks. It is time to count.  2,500 years of counting, we can see remnants of a fifth dimension in the cern collider, and have a couple of working space/time wobble measuring devices.  Counting is dope.  You have to count, everything.  Let's count, design the political and economic systems and then deploy them. What a movie that would be.  No need to break a rule a law a sweat or a nose, just agree we dont want these systems. More on that here:

https://debugamerica.blogspot.com/2021/01/lets-unify.html

Russia- Everywhere - Both Democrats and Republicans

So, this is a coincidence I just noticed.

Ok lets tie Russia to both democrats and republicans.

Republicans are easy, TRUMP-FELIX SATER. Ok forget that. Lev Parnas. That's Rudy and Congressperson Devon Nunes caught red handed with a Ukrainian Russian gangster and a verified, measly, but verified, million Russian dollars floating around. That is bank records and phone records and sdny dox and court dox, fbi dox and phone records. So Putin to billionaire cutout to fraud grantee here in the U.S. via Rossiya bank.

Burisma "we addressed it already" Holdings limited. John Kerry, Joe Biden, both democrats. In 2014 Kerry's son-in-law's business partner, someone named "Archer", is on the same board as Hunter Biden at Burisma. I don't know if it was an $83,000 a month no-show job for Archer, but we do know Hunter himself said it was for him. We don't know if Archer got the all the money or if the business John Kerry's daughter shared with Archer got any. Each Hunter and Archer got $83,000 a month, starting 2014, for being on the board, where Hunter did nothing.

Burisma "we addressed it already" Holdings, ltd. ties to it's owner Mykola Zlochevsky. Him and Burisma were under investigation starting 2012 for dealings with Deutche Bank and Cypress Bank (Both tied to each other by their president, same guy), ties to Rossiya bank (Putin's bank). These are money launderers for Putin's natural gas money, they have paid many billions on fines for that crime.

All roads seem to lead to Russia's money, democrats and republicans. It could be something else, I would have no idea. But as an American I sure would feel better if it were Barclay's Bank and that's almost the worst bank ever. Why Russia?

It could all be kosher, but it all could be we're getting robbed. Maybe if we made a gofundme page, we could pay the 535 of them more, to help us?  Who in the capitol building has more when when Trump leaves office than when he got there.  That would tell a very compelling explainable story.  Who got more money now?  What groups and sub groups in the capitol building has money that moves in predictable ways, when people are working together.  Too bad we are not free to know who governs us.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check this story out 3/19/2021  https://youtu.be/uLIaGGY8hYw


Devin Nunes is caught with Lev Parnas, and Rudy, caught with phone records, bank records, SDNY dox, fbi dox and court dox. Rudy was defacto executive branch, Nunes is the legislature, what was the definition of the word republic again? Now Nunes and Durkach? WTF is up with out intelligence they can't find Russian agents in the capitol building. Putin is the enemy.

Then we have John Kerry and Joe Biden via Devon Archer and Hunter Biden to Mykola Vladislavovich Zlochevsky founder of Burisma "We addressed it already" Holdings ltd, to Deutche Bank with ties to Rusoyia Bank and that is Putin's bank, and Trump.

So, why do both republicans and democrats at the highest levels of our government have side gigs getting paid by Putin, what are they selling? If we arrest a black kid for stealing a big mac in 15 mins why are these people allowed to be running around free and why are they still making choices about our stuff.

Since Congresstraitor Devin Nunes voted "No" and made "arguments" in the impeachment hearings, you know where the prez was in trouble for corruption, while Nunes is a partner in the criminal enterprise, adjudicating his own crime partner? Then Mitch too in the senate, they are one? France can see us, we look like morons. I don't think the impeachments are valid, you know since co-conspirators were allowed to vote on it and all.

I asked Nancy Pelosi about this, well her daughter, Nancy Prowda (both mom and daughter go by Nancy) in emails back and forth last March, she seemed to think this was ok. I do not. I have those text messages and emails back and forth from the Pelosi clan. If the media wanted to know about it, that is.

Did they sell the virus to Putin? How they ran it I mean? Trump looked like he was following instructions. Consistent in his choices. Choices that caused the most harm for us, like the enemy was running our virus, ask the epidemiologists. Make a list of his choices and ask them. I suggested that very thing to Nancy March 2020 she had other things to do, none of them helped. We have a lot of dead for no known reason yet. This might be that reason. Perhaps they "sold" the handling of the virus. Maybe access for that big hack also. I have no idea, maybe not, maybe so. The public facts work wither way. That should scare the shit out of of everyone.

I do know I asked Nancy Pelosi this in March 2020, so if it turns out they paid off debt or sold the virus in any way, and Nancy was asked about this back in March 2020, that brings her into question again. She had other things to do? Why not ask this very obvious question? Who pays Nancy? I am tired of getting robbed.

Biden looks like he is being held up with duct tape

 That's it.  It's 3/10/21 and for weeks it seems to me he is literally a puppet, being held together with chemistry.  He seems to lack reaction, he has a blank stare, he seems unable to "human" at a minimal normal range.  technically.  Like, it seems like he has measurable diagnose-able decline.  I though this during the campaign after super Tuesday seemed like cheating.  Lets see if he dies in office, of if some truth comes out, we got played.