Index of Suspicion, at one point it referred to the idea, that of it does not occur to you to think of something, it is not possible to think that thought. So, before you think anything, it has to occur to you.
That makes sense. Reminds of Pascal and Fermat staring at a cube of coin flips when suddenly, naturally, it occurs to Fermat' brain to ask "Can we use the maths to know what will happen next?" Like how? How did that occur to his brain, just chance, like genes making "random" edits?
So there is a sphere of all the ideas. Only a sliver of them are available to us, and the to the groups we belong to. The more wide or open the angle, the more ideas become available. Not that we get to think them necessarily, but at least it's possible.
We can not think any of the other thoughts ever. Until it occurs to us. For Fermat, staring at a puzzle of coin flips, made that idea occur to him.
Using the data and cognitive science we can mimic this process, at groups. Not the individuals in the groups. Discrete mathematics, used at discrete objects is old settled math. The data science and the cognitive science is newer-ish. They are using the combination and it seems a form an artificial selection process, literally changing the species.
The Key: Seems they are selecting what ideas, would or would not likely enter the index of suspicion of the group.
If they are doing this with the elections, that would explain how every 2 years, 100 plus million people could visit 435 plus x pairs of people, and almost 435 plus x times in a row, select the one what's got more money than the other, in a who's a better candidate contest. I know how to count. I'll never understand why no one at MIT gives a shit that, we are not voting? If I can rant, I am a moron, and I see this clearly, they must know. A binomial coefficient is not possible, this is ridiculous. If good Will Hunting would stand up and count for their country maybe we can count our way out. The voting and the stupid lawyer words as deployed at us, don't work. That's what got us here.
So, if you were born in Cabrini Greene, and the idea that a person in your group can get out of Cabrini Greene never occurs to you, you ain't getting out. Well, unless you're the chess or math or basketball champ. It has to occur to you. Since we can manage this at the group level, what occurs to the group, should we not set the cognitive scientists to do their magic with colors and vibrations and sound etc to see how to do that for racial issues? For adults to lower the temp.
But kids, what age does it occur to us people are different race. What if we set ou tto skip that lesson, then we would not even know. So, for kids one approach for adults another. who knows. This stuff works. Think back to those two mass shootings in a row. No idea if some one did, but we have the ability to point stuff at millions of people looking for one to do a mass shooting. We can make that happen now. If you have the media resources. at the groups. Looks different now huh? It is time to count.
That makes sense. Reminds of Pascal and Fermat staring at a cube of coin flips when suddenly, naturally, it occurs to Fermat' brain to ask "Can we use the maths to know what will happen next?" Like how? How did that occur to his brain, just chance, like genes making "random" edits?
So there is a sphere of all the ideas. Only a sliver of them are available to us, and the to the groups we belong to. The more wide or open the angle, the more ideas become available. Not that we get to think them necessarily, but at least it's possible.
We can not think any of the other thoughts ever. Until it occurs to us. For Fermat, staring at a puzzle of coin flips, made that idea occur to him.
Using the data and cognitive science we can mimic this process, at groups. Not the individuals in the groups. Discrete mathematics, used at discrete objects is old settled math. The data science and the cognitive science is newer-ish. They are using the combination and it seems a form an artificial selection process, literally changing the species.
The Key: Seems they are selecting what ideas, would or would not likely enter the index of suspicion of the group.
If they are doing this with the elections, that would explain how every 2 years, 100 plus million people could visit 435 plus x pairs of people, and almost 435 plus x times in a row, select the one what's got more money than the other, in a who's a better candidate contest. I know how to count. I'll never understand why no one at MIT gives a shit that, we are not voting? If I can rant, I am a moron, and I see this clearly, they must know. A binomial coefficient is not possible, this is ridiculous. If good Will Hunting would stand up and count for their country maybe we can count our way out. The voting and the stupid lawyer words as deployed at us, don't work. That's what got us here.
So, if you were born in Cabrini Greene, and the idea that a person in your group can get out of Cabrini Greene never occurs to you, you ain't getting out. Well, unless you're the chess or math or basketball champ. It has to occur to you. Since we can manage this at the group level, what occurs to the group, should we not set the cognitive scientists to do their magic with colors and vibrations and sound etc to see how to do that for racial issues? For adults to lower the temp.
But kids, what age does it occur to us people are different race. What if we set ou tto skip that lesson, then we would not even know. So, for kids one approach for adults another. who knows. This stuff works. Think back to those two mass shootings in a row. No idea if some one did, but we have the ability to point stuff at millions of people looking for one to do a mass shooting. We can make that happen now. If you have the media resources. at the groups. Looks different now huh? It is time to count.
It's index of suspicion. That could be an answer, at the group. Selecting racism out of the species, the large amygdala, hate, greed, lying, hurting out of the species. Instead Mark Z is selling pots and pans, I bet his mom is so proud.
we have the technology to fix this now, just waiting on the hardware. The fix looks easy now. why is no one talking about it?
No comments:
Post a Comment