I turned it into math. But, instead of taking that and putting
it on the computer, I re-put it into English. The math below is
describable. They are recursive algorithms without loop invariant.
That is false.
So, Nunes is a likely defendant, McConnell confessed, "I am trump,
he is me, one and the same". Both, may be considered Jurors and/or
Judges even Prosecutors. IF that continues to prove out:
So one could
legitimately say, Prosecutors and the Defendants are doing the crimes in
question together, for the purpose of getting them all off, not just
the defendant.
That is literally the exact same corruption we are fighting in Ukraine, exactly the same.
So
in the corruption on trial, the defendant will use a defense of
fighting the exact same corruption that is on trial but in another
country. But the trial's subject corruption (as opposed to procedural
corruption, taking place at this same time) perpetuated this same
corruption there, and here, and now in the court room, the exact same
corruption again, in front of our eyes, live, on tv, as the exact same
corruption is now on trial as we watch it. Like wtf. It's kind of
funny. That is what false looks like. So, this exact same corruption (prosecutor as co-conspirator) is
literally taking place on tv in front of our eyes. It's recursive,
with no loop invariant. Seriously, that's how it will be now. Right?
There
is no reason not to start over. Literally none. That is what true looks like, simple. I mean who cares, do it right, you
know, without all the crimes in the actual process. Extremely vetting all, dem and republican, so we know we are fixing this. Because allowing
those crimes is how we got here today with these crimes.
So Now we have three sets:
Dems vs Republicans, also
Republicans with Trump, also now
Dems & Republicans & President vs. All of us
No one is looking out for us, right? "Us" does not include their kids. All of them together are going to work together to protect as many of the 535 people in the capitol building as they can. From us, you know "we the people", they [cough] represent. Even if it means the prolonged death throws of our republic. We hardly stand a chance, no one is looking out for us, we seem to be on our own.
So Now we have three sets:
Dems vs Republicans, also
Republicans with Trump, also now
Dems & Republicans & President vs. All of us
No one is looking out for us, right? "Us" does not include their kids. All of them together are going to work together to protect as many of the 535 people in the capitol building as they can. From us, you know "we the people", they [cough] represent. Even if it means the prolonged death throws of our republic. We hardly stand a chance, no one is looking out for us, we seem to be on our own.
Just curious, how are
they ever going to be able to use all of the evidence later? I mean
Nunes voted, McConnell already made the rules, isn't it all fruit of
the poisonous tree technically? Plus we do not know where we would be now with a clean, non criminal, congressional impeachment. This is dumb. Is there no context in any court room
where any of this results in a valid procedure. I mean ever, anywhere
in our history?
No comments:
Post a Comment