We are in groups. Sets of people. Natural unordered system sets. Discrete mathematics. The group is one discrete object. The study of discrete objects. Groups.
This is the math we can use to prove things, to get better at knowing "how" to know things. Using discrete mathematics at the group, we may know what will in fact, happen at the group. But not at an individual in the group, there's no way to do that as far as I know.
It involves all the maths, except, non-linear varying quantities. The individual. These maths are the other maths, excluding discrete mathematics.
So, the individual or the group. The singular or the plural. One or many. See the word "or", we can't have both on one processor. Like running windows at the same time it's running MacOs, cant be done. You would need to split the processor to make that work.
Half of us make choices from the singular, half form the plural. These, as we just saw are two different maths. They are not compatible, and we will never unify on anything other than agreeing we do not want this. We should work together to focus only on what each group does not want.
This struggle between one and some defines and shapes our politics, health, money, lives in almost every way, every day. There is no chance to vote our way out from here, the way the system is deployed. If we want someone to sort out our systems, maybe we ought to hire someone who, you know, designs systems. Might that be a way to make sense of this all?
No comments:
Post a Comment